![]() It is evident when he mentions that, “all kids have tremendous talents” (Robinson, 2006). Additionally, he uses key statements of persuasion in his speech. Robinson wants the audience to realize that each person has potential. However, children need an individual approach to determine the way how to teach them and how to reach their highest potential.įurthermore, an ethos appeal within the speech convinces listeners on how the system could be improved to promote creativity. Unfortunately, the education system stigmatizes mistakes through tests and strict learning programs. Hence, if specialists advised her parents differently, they would have spent a lot of time and money on ADHD treatment to force her to focus on subjects at school, which were not significant for her future career (Robinson, 2006). By using a story that provided a contrast between ADHD and talent, the speaker explains how blur is the line between creativity and misunderstanding. Pathos is determined on the level Robinson succeeds to connect to his or her target audience. Unfortunately, a lot of people are underestimated and oppressed due to the inability of educators to understand their talent. At this point, Robinson appeals to pathos so that the audience connects emotionally to the disappointment that the speaker feels when it comes to the existing education system. Unfortunately, Gillian became one of the most creative and most popular ballet dancers of all time. Luckily, specialists told her mother that their child was not sick, saying “she’s a dancer, take her to dance school” (Robinson, 2006). Her parents, who thought she had ADHD, took her to a specialist to determine how her condition could be treated. He begins by narrating the story of a student named Gillian who had trouble staying focused in class. Pathos Analysisįirst of all, Robinson used a pathos appeal to captivate the attention of his audience. He achieved this goal by making proper use of pathos, ethos, and logos appeals throughout his speech. A thorough view of the speech demonstrates that Robinson is concerned about the issue. Therefore, schools discourage creativity in the majority of cases, limiting people’s potentials and stealing their shine. Even when students are allowed to be creative, they face a lot of restrictions on what they do. It sparks the idea that we are “educating people out of their creativity.” Unfortunately, schools encourage students to stand on what is taught socially and intellectually without questioning. Ken Robinson’s speech, “Do schools kill creativity” has become one of the most popular TED Talks. Introductionįor my rhetorical analysis essay example, I have chosen a speech by Ken Robinson who argues that the public education system in America kills creativity. Additionally, the use of rhetorical appeals helped Robinson to call to action so that listeners change their perception of what is right and wrong when it comes to students and their development. He delivers his argument by using ethos, pathos, and logos. The author explains why such a tendency is a problem for society. Also, it happens due to strict educational frameworks where test-solving skills matter the most. Such issues arise due to the low income in various professions. Using the Ted Talk by Ken Robinson, “Do Schools Kill Creativity,” it was found that various institutions fail to educate students in the expected way as they cannot encourage their creativity. ![]() This rhetorical analysis essay example emphasizes the problems that the educational system has right now. Sign in to your account to gain access to orders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |